Comments on: Lib’ral Media Covers Up for Obama

By: Chuck

Chuck — Sun, 11 Feb 2007 00:39:00 +0000

I have to agree that there is no current evidence that Hillary’s campaign is involved in the Obama smear. It makes little sense for her to beat up whom her running mate is likely to be.

The whole thing sounds like a page out of a bad novel. (Not my novel, of course. You can read that sometime, I hope. I’m working on a publisher!)

I’ll wait and see how this plays out. The whole thing is proving hilarious (no Hillaryous pun was intended, folks.)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:03:00 +0000

What do we REALLY need for the next election? Not someone ELECTABLE. We need someone who can DO THE JOB.

I have said in the past that we should really give America a choice: Falwell/Robertson vs Hefner/Fonda. Now, THAT would really determine something, I think.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:33:00 +0000

I’m not looking forward to this election. Don’t get me wrong, I have no faith or respect left for the current administration, but if its going to be another giant dirt flinging contest I’m going to be depressed.

By: Darrin Bell

Darrin Bell — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:11:00 +0000

They minimize it because there’s “no evidence” of any such involvement by the Clinton campaign.

If there were, that would be a good reason not to vote for her. I believe people govern the same way they campaign. Carter campaigned honestly and with positivity for the most part, and that’s how he tried to govern, as far as we know. Bush’s campaign was deceptive. The push-polls implying McCain had an illegitimate (gasp) “Black baby” in 2000, the flyers in Georgia in 2004 suggesting Kerry would “ban the Bible,” etc… and not surprisingly, we end up with possibly the most mendacious administration in our history.

If Hillary is getting off on that same foot (which we have no evidence of, Insight Magazine’s unsourced stories notwithstanding), that would be a good sign she won’t be the antidote to the current administration.

But again, there’s apparently no evidence at this point.

By: Doug

Doug — Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:00:00 +0000

I just love how they minimize Hillary’s involvement in this case of character assassination.

Remember this when it comes time to choose between her and a candidate with the morals not to play the terrorist scare.

By: The pete

The pete — Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:14:00 +0000

To paraphrase Keith Olberman: How do these clowns get away with calling themselves “news” organizations?