[…] recognize the insult added to this injury, you’ll want to read the five-part “Terrorist Strike” series from 2007 (was it really that long ago? I remember creating it like it was just 730 […]
[…] I’m almost finished with the third in my trilogy. In the meantime, check out the witty and peircing observations of Candorville, which has published a series of strips on the recent infrastructure issues and government spending, and of Doonesbury in a series on the absurd administration argument that “if we don’t fight the terrorists in Iraq, we’ll have to fight them here.” […]
[…] I’m almost finished with the third in my trilogy. In the meantime, check out the witty and peircing observations of Candorville, which has published a series of strips on the recent infrastructure issues and government spending, and of Doonesbury in a series on the absurd administration argument that “if we don’t fight the terrorists in Iraq, we’ll have to fight them here.” […]
[…] recognize the insult added to this injury, you’ll want to read the five-part “Terrorist Strike” series from 2007 (was it really that long ago? I remember creating it like it was just 730 […]
[…] I’m almost finished with the third in my trilogy. In the meantime, check out the witty and peircing observations of Candorville, which has published a series of strips on the recent infrastructure issues and government spending, and of Doonesbury in a series on the absurd administration argument that “if we don’t fight the terrorists in Iraq, we’ll have to fight them here.” […]
[…] I’m almost finished with the third in my trilogy. In the meantime, check out the witty and peircing observations of Candorville, which has published a series of strips on the recent infrastructure issues and government spending, and of Doonesbury in a series on the absurd administration argument that “if we don’t fight the terrorists in Iraq, we’ll have to fight them here.” […]