<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco Chronicle solicits more &#8220;Candorville&#8221; feedback!</title>
	<link>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/</link>
	<description>Challenging the Law of Gravitas since 1993</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darrin Bell</title>
		<link>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2159</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2159</guid>
		<description>Nope, it's not too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, it&#8217;s not too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJBharmony</title>
		<link>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>KJBharmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>While surfing your site, I noticed this message.  Is it too late to contact the San Francisco Chronicle?  I have read your work for a while, but I never got involved in anything before.  Is it too late?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While surfing your site, I noticed this message.  Is it too late to contact the San Francisco Chronicle?  I have read your work for a while, but I never got involved in anything before.  Is it too late?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin Bell</title>
		<link>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2030</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2030</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I'm pretty sure Peanuts is safe. Right now there's no other strip that papers think will have universal appeal for children.

The Chronicle did publish an announcement that Doonesbury would be on vacation for three months, but maybe publishing a daily notice on the comics page would have been a good idea, since I'm sure many readers never saw that article.

Thanks for reading, and for commenting! I hope you'll write to the Chronicle and let them know what you think (since they probably aren't reading this blog).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;m pretty sure Peanuts is safe. Right now there&#8217;s no other strip that papers think will have universal appeal for children.</p>
<p>The Chronicle did publish an announcement that Doonesbury would be on vacation for three months, but maybe publishing a daily notice on the comics page would have been a good idea, since I&#8217;m sure many readers never saw that article.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading, and for commenting! I hope you&#8217;ll write to the Chronicle and let them know what you think (since they probably aren&#8217;t reading this blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronaldcowin</title>
		<link>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>ronaldcowin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://candorville.com/2008/04/16/san-francisco-chronicle-solicits-more-candorville-feedback/#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>What struck me was the lack of an explanation of why there was no doonesbury and why Candorville was substituted.  I personally like and enjoy both strips and would like to see both in the Chronicle.  But don't do away with Peanuts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What struck me was the lack of an explanation of why there was no doonesbury and why Candorville was substituted.  I personally like and enjoy both strips and would like to see both in the Chronicle.  But don&#8217;t do away with Peanuts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
