On yesterday's "Why Susan Wants Clinton", our newspaper had the last frame blocked off at Fitz, Fitz, and B- (not Bit-, as shown above). Anyways, it should have been Fitz, Fitz, and T-, which I feel is actually more degrading, and it also rhymes.
That didn't make it through the censors. Even "B" was hard to get through. The family papers would've preferred a "W." But I preferred "B" or "Bit" because that's what they usually call competent, powerful women, and I wanted to make it clear they were more intimidated by her and resentful of her presence than dismissive of her.
View Comments (2)
On yesterday's "Why Susan Wants Clinton", our newspaper had the last frame blocked off at Fitz, Fitz, and B- (not Bit-, as shown above). Anyways, it should have been Fitz, Fitz, and T-, which I feel is actually more degrading, and it also rhymes.
That didn't make it through the censors. Even "B" was hard to get through. The family papers would've preferred a "W." But I preferred "B" or "Bit" because that's what they usually call competent, powerful women, and I wanted to make it clear they were more intimidated by her and resentful of her presence than dismissive of her.